檔案整理者 | 莊嘉健 |
提交日期 | 15/08/2023 |
發佈日期 | 5/2020 |
研究名稱 | Research Report on Public Opinion during the Anti-Extradition Bill (Fugitive Offenders Bill) Movement in Hong Kong |
調查、委託機構 | Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey, The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
抽樣方法 | Random sampling |
調查方法 | On-site protest surveys and telephone surveys |
訪問對象 | On-site protest surveys: People who participated in the protests;Telephone surveys: Hong Kong residents ages 15 and up (Cantonese speakers) |
樣本數量 | On-site protest surveys: 17,233;Telephone surveys: 2,008 |
主要數字、結果撮要 | ~ In the early stages of the Movement in June and early July, a ‘call for the withdrawal of the Fugitive Offenders Bill’ was the most important movement goal upheld by the protesters (i.e., 89.4% to 92.6% of our survey respondents viewed this goal as ‘very important’). ~ By mid-July (July 14), the percentage of respondents who agreed that ‘express dissatisfaction with police’s handling of the protests’ was a very important protest motivation had surpassed that of calling for withdrawal of the Fugitive Offenders Bill (90.4% over 88.0%). During the July 27 protest in Yuen Long, 98.3% protesters viewed peak dissatisfaction with the police actions, much higher than the percentage calling for withdrawal of the Fugitive Offenders Bill (85.1%). ~ According to the last wave of our telephone surveys, 52.6% respondents have participated in the Movement in one way or another;Most interviewed citizens (62.3%) pledged their support to the Movement even after a prolonged escalation of conflicts between protesters and police. ~ Telephone surveys found that as the Movement evolved, members of the public had more distrust of the police, with most respondents (70.6%) dissatisfied with police performance in the Movement; they also disapproved of many police operations in responding to the protests, especially firing live rounds at protesters and concealing police identification numbers on uniforms. Chief among the events or issues that have caused deterioration in the image of police was the 721 incident (82.2%). Other critical events included the 831 incident (49.8%), the firing of live rounds at a protester on October 1 (38.3%) and the handling of detained people at the San Uk Ling Holding Centre (29.0%). ~ As the Movement continued, fewer respondents were worried that radical protests could alienate the general public. The percentage was roughly 50% to 60% during the Movement’s early stages, but it dropped to 20% to 40% during the later stages. |
有關建議 | Not mentioned |
資料來源 | 研究報告 |
關注課題 | 社會民生、政治、法治 |
關鍵字 | 反修例、逃犯修例、民主、政治體制、不和、信任、衝突、示威 |